This is a continuation of the earlier attempt to refute
Prof Bhagavan's false claims against the Hindu Vaidhika dharma:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Youtube Video titled: Prof. Bhagavancontroversial statement on Sri ram:
10. Rama after returning from 14 years of vanavasa, was not
actually ruling the kinggom. His brother Bharat was ruling. There is no proof
to say that Rama was devoted to one wife. He was spending his daytime loitering
around in the company of other women listening to their music, stories and
having illegal relationships. In the evening he used to make Sita drink
alcoholic drinks and he also used to drink. That is why Brahmins have written
that "Raja bahuvallabha" meaning a king can have many wives. Infact they
always write in Kings favor as they get huge money and rewards in return.
Dharmic Response:
There is no pramANa or evidence based on scriptures for the
above claims. All the above is Mr. Bhagavan's wild imagination and his sole aim
seems to gain cheap and quick popularity. All Brahmin and Devata dharma haters
make this blanket statement that Brahmana's make produce literatures and
scriptures depicting the king as God and in return, the kings in return reward
them with huge money and material. Ofcourse, there are instances where the
kings reward scholarship of brAhmaNas. But true brAhmaNAs shun money and
material possessions. Even those who accept reward utilize the same for the
performance of dharma/sacrifice/charity for the good of the world. Sri SudhAma's
story in Bhagavatam is a perfect example. If what Mr. Bhagawan says is true
then the entire Brahmins should be the richest and wealthiest community even
today, which is not the case. True brAhmaNas consider Veda and education as the
real wealth even today.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Youtube video titled: Sangh Parivar -spokesmen for the caste system:
11. The word Varna is generally believed to stand for
color. But it is not. Dr.B R ambedkar has found a meaning in Zend
avesta...where the root var stands for discrimination....So it means claiming
superiority based on one's birth...
Swamy Vivekananda has told that there are no
Kshatriyas...there are only 3% brahmins and all the rest are shudras.
Brahmain's aim is to remove Indian constitution and replace with Manusmruthi
and control the majority shudra population.
Dharmika:
It is sheer stupidity to find the meaning of the sanskrit
word in Zend Avesta. True Brahmin's will continue to protect Veda and engage in
their dharma/tapasya whether there is Constitution or not.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. B:
Rama was there to protect charturvarna especially
brahmins....to worship for brahmins.
Once upon a time there were gods like indra, varuna and so
on...today they all are forgotten...likewise we have to forget all these so
called brahmin leaders and their gods....Sri Ramakrishna is the modern prophet
of India...He practiced and proved that all religions lead to same truth...So
all brahmins and their gods are haters of humanity.
DhArmika:
All the devatas like Indra, chandra, vAyu, Agni are
divinities working behind natural elements and in one's own body/mind/intellect
and they are aspects of the universal Consciousness that cannot be denied.
Sri Ramakrishna's realization that all religions are true
is based on the Vedic truth that God is established in all in the form of inner
Self or paramAtma. This also indirectly proves all religions that denies or
locates God outside the self/universe is false.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.B:
There is no equality in the vedas. Indian constitution has
equality...Ambedkar has said that he has borrowed his ideas from Buddha and
upanishads....these upanishads were written after Buddha...
Buddha said don't believe in me...just think and if you
agree you accept otherwise you reject...
DhArmika:
There is no equality anywhere in nature. There is only
diversity. Equality arises only when the same indwelling God or antaryAmi
Brahman is SEEN in all which is a Vedic truth.
Ultimately there is Shunya or nothing in Buddha’s teaching
and so there is nothing to accept or reject. But Vedic truth of Brahman shining
as the inner Self of all can never be rejected.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. B:
Shankara, Madhva and Ramanuja all strengthened caste
system....unfortunately they all wrote in sanskrit...common man cannot read and
so they dont know....
Hindu has two faces...the highest philosophy in
upanishads...no question about it...But there is another face of caste system
based on vedas...this needs to be rejected.
DhArmika:
Accepting Upanishad and rejecting Veda/VarnAshrama is like
accepting the Self and rejecting the body/mid/speech through which the
Self/Truth manifests. There is difference in the body but equality based on the
soul/God.
The entire society/world/universe is the body of God. The
four varnas form the four major parts of the God's body -
head-hands-abdomen-legs. They all are different but form one single whole and
have to work according to their nature in unison for the benefit of the
individual self/God. So performance of one's duty/svadharma as a service to the
indwelling God is dharma. Anything opposed to it is selfish/adharma.
All the AchAryas therefore have supported this universal
eternal dharma.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.B:
Burtrand Russel has criticized Christ as he cursed a fig
tree because it did not give fruit when he was hungry and asked for it. But the
tree did not give because it was not the right season. In another place Christ
said all those who don't believe in me will go to hell. So, he should be
rejected...
Socrates was also rejected because both he and Plato were
unhappy due to the rise of their haters...But Buddha did not do that. He just
asked people to think and only accept if convinced to be true. So, he should be
accepted.
DhArmika:
There is self-contradiction here Mr. B.
Buddha's followers are often referred to as
"Buddhus" (ignorants) as their philosophy of rejecting everything as
false, ultimately rejects itself! The Self that rejects everything can never be
rejected. So Buddha indirectly teaching VedAnta only!
Namaste
Suresh
No comments:
Post a Comment