Refutation of Prof K.S. Bhagavan's claims - 2

This is a continuation of the earlier attempt to refute Prof Bhagavan's false claims against the Hindu Vaidhika dharma: 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Youtube Video titled: Prof. Bhagavan controversial statement on Sri ram:

10. Rama after returning from 14 years of vanavasa, was not actually ruling the kinggom. His brother Bharat was ruling. There is no proof to say that Rama was devoted to one wife. He was spending his daytime loitering around in the company of other women listening to their music, stories and having illegal relationships. In the evening he used to make Sita drink alcoholic drinks and he also used to drink. That is why Brahmins have written that "Raja bahuvallabha" meaning a king can have many wives. Infact they always write in Kings favor as they get huge money and rewards in return.

Dharmic Response: 

There is no pramANa or evidence based on scriptures for the above claims. All the above is Mr. Bhagavan's wild imagination and his sole aim seems to gain cheap and quick popularity. All Brahmin and Devata dharma haters make this blanket statement that Brahmana's make produce literatures and scriptures depicting the king as God and in return, the kings in return reward them with huge money and material. Ofcourse there are instances where the kings reward scholarship of brAhmaNas. But true brAhmaNAs shun money and material possessions. Even those who accept reward utilize the same for the performance of dharma/sacrifice/charity for the good of the world. Sri SudhAma's story in Bhagavatam is a perfect example. If what Mr. Bhagawan says is true then the entire Brahmins should be the richest and wealthiest community even today, which is not the case. True brAhmaNas consider Veda and education as the real wealth even today.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Youtube video titled: Sangh Parivar - spokesmen for the caste system:

11. The word Varna is generally believed to stand for color. But it is not. Dr.B R ambedkar has found a meaning in Zend avesta...where the root var stands for discrimination....So it means claiming superiority based on one's birth...

Swamy Vivekananda has told that there are no Kshatriyas...there are only 3% brahmins and all the rest are shudras. Brahmain's aim is to remove Indian constitution and replace with Manusmruthi and control the majority shudra population.

Dharmika:

It is sheer stupidity to find the meaning of the sanskrit word in Zend Avesta. True Brahmin's will continue to protect Veda and engage in their dharma/tapasya whether there is Constitution or not. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. B: 

Rama was there to protect charturvarna especially brahmins....to worship for brahmins.

Once upon a time there were gods like indra, varuna and so on...today they all are forgotten...likewise we have to forget all these so called brahmin leaders and their gods....Sri Ramakrishna is the modern prophet of India...He practiced and proved that all religions lead to same truth...So all brahmins and their gods are haters of humanity.

DhArmika:

All the devatas like Indra, chandra, vAyu, Agni exist as inner controllers of natural elements and in one's own body/mind/intellect and they are like spiritual sparks rooted in consciousness that cannot be denied.

Sri Ramakrishna's realization that all religions are true is based on the Vedic truth that God is established in all in the form of inner Self or paramAtma. This also indirectly proves all religions that denies or locates God outside the self/universe is false.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr.B: 
There is no equality in the vedas....Indian constitution has equality...Ambedkar has said that he has borrowed his ideas from Buddha and upanishads....these upanishads were written after Buddha...
Buddha said don't believe in me...just think and if you agree you accept otherwise you reject...

DhArmika:

There is no equality anywhere in nature. There is only diversity. Equality arises only when the same indwelling God or antaryAmi Brahman is SEEN in all which is a Vedic idea . 

Buddha's teaching can be agreed or rejected. But Vedic truth of Brahman existing as the inner Self of all can never be rejected.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. B:

Shankara, Madhva and Ramanuja all strengthened caste system....unfortunately they all wrote in sanskrit...common man cannot read and so they dont know....

Hindu has two faces...the highest philosophy in upanishads...no question about it...But there is another face of caste system based on vedas...this needs to be rejected.

DhArmika:

Accepting Upanishad and rejecting Veda/VarnAshrama is like accepting the Self and rejecting the body/mid/speech through which the Self/Truth manifests. There is difference in the body but equality based on the soul/God. 

The entire society/world/universe is the body of God. The four varnas form the four major parts of the God's body - head-hands-abdomen-legs. They all are different but form one single whole and have to work according to their nature in unison for the benefit of the individual self/God. So performance of one's duty/svadharma as a service to the indwelling God is dharma. Anything opposed to it is selfish/adharma.

All the AchAryas therefore have supported this universal eternal dharma.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Mr.B:
Burtrand russel has criticized Christ as he cursed a fig tree because it did not give fruit when he was hungry and asked for it....But the tree did not give because it was not the right seasona. In another place Christ said all those who don't believe in me will go to hell....So he should be rejected...

Socrates was also rejected because both he and plato were unhappy due to the rise of their haters...But Buddha did not do that...So he should be accepted.

DhArmika:

There is self-contradiction here Mr. B.

Buddha's followers can be called "Buddhus" (ignorants) as their philosophy of rejecting everything as false, also gets rejected as false ultimately! 

Namaste

Suresh

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------