In the following video Sri Mani Dravida Shastrigal has presented a very lucid introduction to the philosophy of Advaita as propounded by Sri AcharyA Shankara.
Dr.S.Srinivasan Endowment Lecture on "Advaitam-An Introduction" by Dr. Mani Dravid Shastrigal
Here are some of the main points:
- Advaita
is primarily the non-duality of the essential Atman or the Self that is
there in all.
- Those
who don’t believe in God identify the Self with the body.
- Those
who believe in God, will identify the self, body and God as different and
real.
- All
VedAntins agree that God as the paramAthma, is Advaita – one without a
second
- Dvaita
holds that the Brahman / Ishwara is different from the self / jiva and
jagat.
- VishishtAdvaita
holds that Brahman/Ishwara is inseparably one with self / jiva and jagat.
- There
are many VishishtAdvitas – like Vishnu VishishtAdvaita, Shiva VishishtAdvaita
and so on – but ultimately, they are Advaita only without denying the
reality of Dvaita / jagat.
- But
Dvaita appears to be just opposed to Advaita.
- Advaita
holds that:
- The
self is neither the enjoyed/bhOgyam/jada nor the enjoyer/bhoktA/jiva.
- The
Brahman/ParamAthma as the unqualified witnessing Self alone exists or
real.
- Everything
else other than this Brahman / Self is false or does not exist.
- Advaita
alone truly gives the meaning of Veda/shruti as follows:
- Shantam
Shivam Advaitam chaturtham manyante sa AtmA
- jnyAte
Dvaitam na vidyate
- B.Gita
also identifies the Self as kshetragya and all kshetra as false.
- Atman
alone is real. There is no anAtma jagat at all.
- All
other non-advaitic schools are not teaching the above true meaning of
Vedas / shruthi.
- Advaita still accepts the existence of “bhAvaroopa ajnyAna” or the primordial ignorance because of which duality is experienced in transaction by even Advaita teachers. But this will disappear upon attainment of the Advaita Brahman
Here are some observations with the sole intent to reconcile
all VedAntic schools:
- Point
#10 above proves that Advaitins are dvaitins when it comes to vyavahAra. Advaitic
Brahman always remains as the ground of the dualistic jagat!
- In fact,
there is no clearcut line that divides Advaita, Dvaita, vishishtAdvaita.
The non-dual Brahman as the inner Self of all, is the connecting link that
unites all of them.
- All
Vedantins accept Ishwara as the SarvAntaryAmi paramAtma– indwelling
ultimate Self.
- If
Ishwara is the Self then jagat exists as His body.
- The
difference and inseparable oneness between atman and shareera is
undeniable.
- The
antaryAmi brAhmaNa of the BruhadAraNyaka Upanishad explicitly teaches every
entity in jagat as Brahman’s body
- Actually,
Acharya Shankara also accepts Brahma shareera while explaining the
unbroken line of guru-shishya Parampara.
- The
name dvaita is built into the name Advaita. It is hard to imagine any
other name for Advaita without Dvaita.
- The
difference between mithya and satya must be accepted by all, including
Advaitins.
- The
non-dual Self that is taught in the Mandukya is the SarvAtma / Self of all
where all names/forms are included and transcended. It is actually the
source/abode/destination of everything.
- It is
the same Self / Ishwara / Narayana who is established in all – Sarva
bhutastham ekam narayanam.
- jnyAte
Dvaitam na vidyate – simply means the worldly dualities like birth/death,
joy/sorrow, kama/krodha and so on, will cease to exist for a jnAni who has
attained the paramAtman.
- But
still, all names/forms arise/remain/returns back to the all-pervading Self.
- The
self/existence of the jiva/jagat is not outside the Self/existence of
nArAyana.
- The
self is limited by non-self. But Brahman has no limitation. This proves
that Brahman is other than the self/jiva and is the self of the anAtma
prakrithi also.
- That
is the reason Brahma sutra advises to do Brahma drushti in anAtma /
prateeka (as opposed to atma Drishti)
- The
entire jagat exists in the self and the self in Brahman.
- In the
pot-space example, Jagat is the pot and Brahman is the space that is
inside and outside the pot. Whether the pot is intact or broken, the mud
will continue to exist in space.
- The
pot-mud example also proves Brahman as the Self is the material and
efficient cause for the body/jagat.
- In the
rope snake example, there is difference between the seer and the
rope/snake.
- The
jagat will bring sorrow when seen as an object of enjoyment. But when it
is seen as Ishwara himself, it will protect and sustain the jiva.
- Brahman
exists in Advaitin, Dvaitins, VishishtAdvaitins and in all beings whatever
may be their world view.
- The
Kshetra-Kshetragnya relation taught in the B.Gita also establishes the
body-soul relation that obtains between Jagat and Ishwara/Brahman.
- Though
VishishtAdvaita in general supports, all kinds of theistic schools like
Shiva, Devi and so on, identification or existence of all such name/form/deities
culminates in Vishnu who is everywhere.
- The vedAntic Self or Brahman, is all pervading and indwelling in all name/forms and this meaning is explicitly captured in the name nArAyaNa. There is support for this in Vedas, B.Gita and Sri Shankara bhAshya.
- Ultimately all names point to the indwelling Self that is shining in All. But it is the sarvAtma or the Self of the universe and so there is a need to identify and accept the entire universe as the body of Ishwara.
- Atman is the source/abode/destination of jagat. Atman is Truth and Jagat is Dharma.
- Wherever there is Truth there is Dharma and that alone reveals Truth.
The above is true VedAnta that fosters mutual
respect. People who do not SEE Brahman in others (anAtma prakruthi) cannot
claim to be VedAntins.
Suresh